| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans |
| Date: | 2019-04-05 23:26:32 |
| Message-ID: | 21950.1554506792@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 14:01, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I don't have any more comments.
> Great. Many thanks for having a look at this. Going by [1], Julien
> also seems pretty happy, so I'm going to change this over to ready for
> committer.
Pushed with some hacking, mostly trying to improve the comments.
The only really substantive thing I changed was that you'd missed
teaching ExecSetTupleBound about descending through Append.
Now that we can have plans that are Limit-above-Append-above-Sort,
that's important.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-04-05 23:28:11 | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-04-05 23:15:53 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |