Re: Request for official clarification on SQL parameter parsing changes in PostgreSQL 15 and 16

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: 王 博 <bo(dot)wang(at)infortech(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 李 浩 <hao(dot)li(at)infortech(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Request for official clarification on SQL parameter parsing changes in PostgreSQL 15 and 16
Date: 2025-04-17 14:15:52
Message-ID: 2194846.1744899352@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 05:17 +0000, 王 博 wrote:
>> 1. In PostgreSQL 15 and later:
>>    The following SQL causes a syntax error unless a space is added after the `?`:
>>      SELECT * FROM table WHERE a = ?AND b = 123;
>>    → Adding a space (`? AND`) resolves the issue.

> I'd say it is this change:
> https://postgr.es/c/2549f0661bd28571d7200d6f82f752a7ee5d47e1

Yeah. This looks like "?" ought to be parsable as a separate token
... but as Dominique noted, it's not actually legal syntax in any
version of Postgres. Something in your client stack must be
translating "?" to "$1", "$2", etc, and so the new prohibition
against junk trailing a number applies.

You could fix this without application-level changes if you fixed
whatever is making that substitution to add spaces around the
parameter symbol. It's really a bug that it didn't do so already,
since closely-adjacent cases like digits immediately after the
"?" would already have caused failures.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-04-17 14:23:18 Re: Cannot turn track_counts on
Previous Message Anton Shepelev 2025-04-17 14:05:34 Re: Cannot turn track_counts on