Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I can reproduce the
>> reported problem without your patch by using that flag. Here's a
>> recipe:
> Interesting.
> Note that if the standard that we're going to hold a solution to here
> is "must produce sane output with --ignore-system-indexes", then my
> solution will not meet that standard.
Do you mean "same" output, or "sane" output? I'd certainly expect
the latter.
I think though that Alvaro was just offering this as a way to poke
at the posited bug in dependency.c without having to install your
whole patch.
regards, tom lane