Re: GEQO status?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GEQO status?
Date: 2000-12-23 00:04:49
Message-ID: 21912.977529889@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
> is there a reason why GEQO is off by
> default in the ODBC driver (postdrv.exe)?

There may once have been a good reason for that, but it sounds like a
mighty bad idea nowadays.

AFAICT ODBC's default setting has been that way for as long as ODBC has
been in our CVS tree, so no way to know who chose to do that, when, or
why.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-12-23 00:11:13 Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-22 23:54:04 Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs