| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] which list? |
| Date: | 1999-06-01 16:23:30 |
| Message-ID: | 21912.928254210@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> Just a reminder: imho it makes no sense to run cvsup in any mode other
> than fetching the entire cvs repository. Then you can do any and all
> cvs reading operations locally. The new cvs docs show an example which
> does this, but the sample cvsup configuration file posted at
> postgresql.org still only shows the "fetch current checkout tree"
> example which is far less useful.
Right ... if you want to store only the current tree locally, you might
as well forget cvsup and just use bare cvs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-06-01 16:26:57 | Re: [HACKERS] which list? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-06-01 16:22:54 | Re: [HACKERS] which list? |