| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? |
| Date: | 2003-10-21 14:13:00 |
| Message-ID: | 21903.1066745580@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> *sigh* - it's really not my day today. Attached is patch that actually
> compiles and fixes the problem. We will need to bump CATVERSION, and
> maybe should test all the other qualified functions?
I think you've identified a real issue, but how many of these modified
functions did you actually test? I thought SUBSTRING was a reserved
word, for example ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Henry Berevoescu | 2003-10-21 14:19:18 | Complex/elaborate user-defined base types |
| Previous Message | Bob Badour | 2003-10-21 14:08:22 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-21 15:22:35 | Re: pg_dump problems against 7.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-21 13:37:31 | Re: AIX port current |