From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parsing config files in a directory |
Date: | 2009-10-25 22:21:14 |
Message-ID: | 21891.1256509274@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I just don't buy it. With the instructions in the file, a program
> that rewrites the file will fail miserably on every installation out
> there (or will be full of logic that tries, futilely, to parse the
> comments). With the instructions out of the file, a program that
> rewrites the file will work just fine on all installations except
> those that have chosen to do the thing you describe above. And we can
> tell people "don't do that any more, because it'll mess up the
> automated tools".
No, you *think* you might be able to tell people that. It is not
going to fly. It is especially not going to fly when the automated
tools are still just pie-in-the-sky rather than real live commonly
used tools.
Please re-read what Greg had to say.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-25 22:34:28 | Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2009-10-25 22:17:17 | License clarification: BSD vs MIT |