| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optimizing COPY |
| Date: | 2008-11-12 02:37:00 |
| Message-ID: | 21883.1226457420@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I'd really like to work on this to get it into 8.4, but being honest to
> myself, I don't think I have the time to finish and benchmark it. I'm
> swamped with reviewing other's patches, as well as with non-PG-related
> work. I have some work to do on my visibility map patch too, which seems
> more important.
Agreed, you should get the visibility map done first. The copy hack is
just a marginal thing; partial vacuums would be game-changing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2008-11-12 02:38:30 | Meaning of transaction pg_locks? |
| Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-11-12 02:24:20 | Re: autovacuum and reloptions |