From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cannot to compile PL/V8 on Fedora 20 |
Date: | 2014-05-12 14:31:04 |
Message-ID: | 21844.1399905064@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 05/12/2014 07:10 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> I am trying to compile PL/v8 without success. I have Postgres
>> installed via compilation from source code.
>> plv8.cc:50:56: error: declaration of Datum
>> plv8_call_handler(FunctionCallInfo) throw () has a different
>> exception specifier
>> Datum plv8_call_handler(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) throw();
>> ^
>> plv8.cc:43:7: error: from previous declaration Datum
>> plv8_call_handler(FunctionCallInfo)
>> PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(plv8_call_handler);
> This looks like a result of commit
> <http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=e7128e8dbb305059c30ec085461297e619bcbff4>
Ouch. I was a bit suspicious of that change from the start, but it hadn't
occurred to me that functions written in C++ would have an issue with it.
> Maybe we need a way of telling the preprocessor to suppress the
> generation of a prototype?
Maybe we need to revert that patch altogether. Dealing with this is
likely to introduce much more pain and confusion than the change is worth.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-12 14:38:59 | Re: Select queries which violates table constrains |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-05-12 14:24:59 | Re: cannot to compile PL/V8 on Fedora 20 |