Re: COPY enhancements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY enhancements
Date: 2009-09-11 16:28:03
Message-ID: 21841.1252686483@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> No, it *isn't* cheap. Particularly not for COPY, for which we need an
>> ad-hoc parser in psql.

> :-( That's definitely a complication, although it seems to me it will
> need substantial work no matter what option we decide on.

True :-(. But I'm hoping we only have to revise it once more, not every
time somebody thinks of another COPY option.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-09-11 16:37:43 Re: COALESCE and NULLIF semantics
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-11 16:11:29 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types