From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: error after dropping column |
Date: | 2010-01-12 00:12:45 |
Message-ID: | 21828.1263255165@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> On 11/01/2010 10:27 PM, Filip Rembiakowski wrote:
>> ERROR: table row type and query-specified row type do not match
>> DETAIL: Physical storage mismatch on dropped attribute at ordinal
>> position 2.
> I'm pretty certain that's not a bug.
No, it is a bug, or at least an overlooked case. There might be some
variants of this that aren't readily fixable, but that one is/was:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-01/msg00168.php
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-12 02:31:57 | Re: BUG #5272: PL/Python SELECT: return composite fields as dict, not str |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2010-01-11 23:22:34 | Re: error after dropping column |