Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?
Date: 2022-01-25 02:50:12
Message-ID: 2182667.1643079012@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> On 2022-01-24 15:35:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Sure. Do we want to revert in HEAD too?

>> Not sure. I'm also OK with trying to go with Thomas' patch to walreceiver and
>> try a bit longer to get all this working. Thomas?

> I vote for reverting in release branches only. I'll propose a better
> WES patch set for master that hopefully also covers async append etc
> (which I was already planning to do before we knew about this Windows
> problem). More soon.

WFM, but we'll have to remember to revert this in v15 if we don't
have a solid fix by then.

It's kinda late here, so I'll push the reverts tomorrow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-01-25 02:54:45 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-01-25 02:36:09 Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands