| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | mailreg(at)numerixtechnology(dot)de |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ORDER BY and NULLs |
| Date: | 2004-09-19 20:30:29 |
| Message-ID: | 21812.1095625829@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
T E Schmitz <mailreg(at)numerixtechnology(dot)de> writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> Which book is it?
> PostgreSQL by Korry Douglas + Susan Douglas, ISBN 0-7357-1257-3; Feb 2003
Hmm, I've heard of that book but never seen it. The authors are not
participants in the PG community --- AFAICT neither of them have ever
posted anything in the mailing lists.
> The paragraph continues:
> "If the SELECT command included the clause WHERE phone NOT NULL,
> PostgreSQL could use the index to satisfy the ORDER BY clause.
> An index that covers optional (NOT NULL) columns will not be used to
> speed table joins either."
My goodness, it seems to be a veritable fount of misinformation :-(
I wonder how much of this is stuff that is true for Oracle and they just
assumed it carried over?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | T E Schmitz | 2004-09-19 20:50:00 | Re: ORDER BY and NULLs |
| Previous Message | T E Schmitz | 2004-09-19 20:22:23 | Re: ORDER BY and NULLs |