From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" in child table must be marked NOT NULL |
Date: | 2017-12-13 01:41:24 |
Message-ID: | 217ddce6-1b0f-509d-f8e0-5ddd9cad5d86@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi.
On 2017/12/13 9:22, Ali Akbar wrote:
> For me, it's better to prevent that from happening. So, attempts to
> DROP NOT NULL on the child must be rejected. The attached patch does
> that.
>
> Unfortunately, pg_class has no "has_parent" attribute, so in this
> patch, it hits pg_inherits everytime DROP NOT NULL is attempted.
>
> Notes:
> - It looks like we could remove the parent partition checking above?
> Because the new check already covers what it does
I noticed that too.
So, if we're going to prevent DROP NOT NULL on *all* child table (not just
partitions), we don't need the code that now sits there to prevent that
only for partitions.
Minor comments on the patch:
+ /* If rel has parents, shoudn't drop NOT NULL if parent has the same */
How about: ".. if some parent has the same"
+ heap_close(parent, AccessShareLock);
Maybe, we shouldn't be dropping the lock so soon.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moyers | 2017-12-13 01:45:44 | [PATCH] Possible NULL deref in str_time |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-12-13 01:37:50 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |