Re: Make SIGHUP less painful if pg_hba.conf is not readable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)endpoint(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Make SIGHUP less painful if pg_hba.conf is not readable
Date: 2009-03-04 03:15:39
Message-ID: 21786.1236136539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)endpoint(dot)com> writes:
> From the comment in hba.c, it appears that the desired behavior is to
> have the system ignore the failure,

I'm not sure how you could possibly read that comment that way.

It might be sane to distinguish initial load from reload, but I think
the behavior is correct as-is for initial load.

Also, if we are going to do something like this, we should make sure
it's consistent across all the config files.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2009-03-04 03:43:35 Re: Hot standby, running xacts, subtransactions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-04 03:10:21 Re: Regclass and quoted table names