| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, buildfarm(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop? |
| Date: | 2024-05-16 21:34:24 |
| Message-ID: | 2175480.1715895264@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2024-05-16 Th 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd rather have some visible status on the BF dashboard. Invariably,
>> with a problem like this, the animal's owner is unaware there's a
>> problem. If it's just silently not reporting, then no one else will
>> notice either, and we effectively lose an animal (despite it still
>> burning electricity to perform those rejected runs).
> Fair enough. That will mean some database changes and other stuff, so it
> will take a bit longer.
Sure, I don't think it's urgent.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-05-16 21:35:45 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2024-05-16 21:29:23 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |