Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef())

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
Cc: zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz (Zakkr), pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef())
Date: 1999-10-29 14:25:28
Message-ID: 2174.941207128@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> Oh man, this little 'piece of magic' (as someone else called
> it) was only intended to demonstrate that it is POSSIBLE AT
> ALL to translate a querytree back into it's original SQL
> statement. Why the hell did I assist in making use of it in
> pg_dump?

Because it solved a necessary problem. Don't beat yourself up about
it...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-29 21:29:19 Serial and NULL values
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-10-29 13:47:44 Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef())