| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_geqo |
| Date: | 2001-01-12 22:09:50 |
| Message-ID: | 21739.979337390@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Martin A. Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> writes:
> as you can see, there is a pg_geqo.sample, but not a pg_geqo. Should I
> rename it for it to work?
Only if you want to mess with the default GEQO parameters.
The debug messages you show don't seem to indicate that anything's
wrong, so I'm not at all clear on what your complaint is.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2001-01-12 22:26:49 | Re: Re: php, time and postgresql |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-12 22:08:11 | Re: php, time and postgresql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-01-12 22:16:07 | RE: CRCs |
| Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-01-12 22:09:05 | RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea |