From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
Date: | 2003-09-08 02:20:21 |
Message-ID: | 21721.1062987621@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not
>>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea.
> Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under
> MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't
> gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff.
Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
cost us CVS storage forever.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-08 02:30:54 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-08 02:15:33 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-08 02:30:54 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-08 02:15:33 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |