| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1 |
| Date: | 2007-09-28 05:30:36 |
| Message-ID: | 21714.1190957436@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> * What are we going to do with contrib/tsearch2? Probably not a beta
>> stopper either, but it needs to be decided.
> IMO, we loose contrib/tsearch2. I think it will be confusing and cause
> problems to have both.
Certainly we aren't going to ship it as-is. What I was wondering was
whether there was any use in creating a backwards-compatibility package
for current users of tsearch2 --- and if so whether anyone felt like
making that happen. If not, we'll just "cvs remove" the thing before
8.3 final release; but I'm throwing the point out as something that
somebody might want to work on before final.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-09-28 05:43:00 | Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-28 03:35:58 | Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1 |