Re: Backup, restore & pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backup, restore & pg_dump
Date: 2000-10-16 04:27:39
Message-ID: 21703.971670459@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> As a result do people have any objection to changing pg_restore to
> pg_undump? Or pg_load?

Out of those two names, I'd vote for pg_load ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-10-16 04:42:56 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml (jdbc.sgml)
Previous Message Philip Warner - CVS 2000-10-16 03:34:47 pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref (allfiles.sgml)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-16 04:41:49 Re: Performance on inserts
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-16 04:12:58 Re: Performance on inserts