From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Updated macOS start scripts |
Date: | 2017-11-15 19:00:33 |
Message-ID: | 21689.1510772433@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The stuff in contrib/start-scripts/osx/ does not, as far as I know,
>> work at all on any recent release of macOS, because SystemStarter
>> is long gone. I propose replacing it with the attached, which
>> I've tested on current-vintage Macs.
> Overall, I think supporting 10.10 and greater is more relevant than continuing
> to support 10.4 and earlier, though I suppose someone could argue for
> keeping both in side-by-side files with the README directing users which to
> use for whichever version of OS X they happen to be running. It's of no
> consequence to me, since my oldest mac is running 10.6.8, but somebody
> from the museum of old macs might feel differently.
Well, we have no buildfarm coverage before 10.4, so to my mind those
releases are desupported already. In practice I wonder whether anyone
is really running PG on such old releases anyway. Certainly I wouldn't
think they'd be making new PG installations on machines that old.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-11-15 19:05:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-11-15 18:57:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II |