From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately |
Date: | 2013-06-01 15:57:09 |
Message-ID: | 21686.1370102229@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I can look at having pg_dump ignore these entries, but I suspect that
> will be quite a bit more invasive.
Actually, I believe the answer is just that getSchemaData() is doing
things in the wrong order:
if (g_verbose)
write_msg(NULL, "reading rewrite rules\n");
getRules(fout, &numRules);
/*
* Identify extension member objects and mark them as not to be dumped.
* This must happen after reading all objects that can be direct members
* of extensions, but before we begin to process table subsidiary objects.
*/
if (g_verbose)
write_msg(NULL, "finding extension members\n");
getExtensionMembership(fout, extinfo, numExtensions);
Per that comment, getRules() should be called down where indexes,
constraints, and triggers are processed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-06-01 16:39:08 | Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2013-06-01 15:39:11 | Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately |