Re: pgsql: Improve performance of repeated CALLs within plpgsql procedures.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Improve performance of repeated CALLs within plpgsql procedures.
Date: 2021-01-26 15:16:50
Message-ID: 2167663.1611674210@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 03:28:39AM +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Improve performance of repeated CALLs within plpgsql procedures.

> lapwing is generating a warning here:

Yeah, I saw that last night. It's weird, because that patch surely
did not change anything that should affect defined-ness of retval.
I plan to fix it by just immediately initializing retval, but I want
to wait a little bit, because I'm curious to see if any other compilers
complain.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-01-26 18:05:21 pgsql: Code review for psql's helpSQL() function.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-01-26 10:54:46 Re: pgsql: Improve performance of repeated CALLs within plpgsql procedures.