From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | printf("%lf",...) isn't actually portable |
Date: | 2018-05-19 22:31:54 |
Message-ID: | 21670.1526769114@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed while poking at the recent ecpg unpleasantness that some
of my older critters were warning about use of %lf conversions in
printf. Looking into it, I find that current POSIX says the "l"
is a no-op, while SUSv2 says it's undefined. I think this usage
got into our code as a result of people making false analogies
between scanf and printf conversions.
I think we should just switch these to plain %f, as per attached.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
remove-unportable-lf-format-specs.patch | text/x-diff | 5.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-05-19 22:33:22 | Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-05-19 20:05:48 | Re: FindDefinedSymbol() is subtly broken |