| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling |
| Date: | 2009-12-31 03:54:00 |
| Message-ID: | 21634.1262231640@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> That doesn't seem like enough to guarantee that you've got the right
>> function.
> As Tim said elsewhere:
>> I don't see either of those as significant issues: "If you need more
>> control for a particular SP then don't use SP::* to call that SP."
If the thing actively fails when there's more than one possible match,
that might be ok. Randomly choosing a match, not so much.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-12-31 04:17:29 | Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-12-31 03:50:11 | pg_migrator issues |