Re: RC1?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1?
Date: 2002-11-13 15:06:15
Message-ID: 21595.1037199975@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> Why use awk for this at all ? and not:
> echo "\\set ECHO all"

I think Bruce is worried about portability; some versions of echo might
do something weird with the backslash. OTOH, it's not obvious to me
that awk is better on that score. Bruce?

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: RC1? at 2002-11-13 13:23:11 from Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD

Responses

  • Re: RC1? at 2002-11-13 16:28:02 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2002-11-13 15:14:15 Re: performance regression, 7.2.3 -> 7.3b5 w/ VIEW
Previous Message Philip Warner 2002-11-13 14:52:34 Re: pg_dump in 7.4