RE: RE: SSL Patch - again :-)

From: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: SSL Patch - again :-)
Date: 2000-08-23 14:11:33
Message-ID: 215896B6B5E1CF11BC5600805FFEA82103D97C91@sirius.edu.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I think I wasn't clear enough. :-) It can *already* be
> specified by any
> > client application as long as you use PQconnectdb(). For example:
> > PQconnectdb("dbname='foo' host='localhost' requiressl=1")
>
> I understand but this setting needs to be made available externally in
> some cases like psql and pg_dump and I was afraid of option letter
> inflation.
I was thinking we could use a "psql variable" in the case of psql, if we
wanted. For example:
psql -h localhost template1 -v "requiressl=1"
or something like that?

Oh, and it's still available by
PGREQUIRE_SSL=1 pgdump <whatever>

> Actually, isn't there a trichotomy here: 1. require SSL, 2. use SSL if
> available, 3. refuse SSL. The server side already handles all
> cases: 1 -
> "hostssl" in pg_hba.conf, 2 - `postmaster -l', 3 - default. The client
> side should perhaps also have these choices, not sure.
Good point. The reason for the client to not do SSL when both client and
server supports it could be performance, I guess.
Perhaps we shuold replace PGREQUIRE_SSL with "PGSSLMODE", being:
0 - Refuse SSL
1 - Negotiate, Prefer non-SSL
2 - Negotiate, Prefer SSL (default)
3 - Require SSL

Anything else you guys will need on this patch before it's fine? :-) No
rush, but just so I know what to work on...

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-08-23 14:30:30 Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-08-23 14:03:37 Re: New MAC OUI capabilities