Re: Mailing list subscription's mail delivery delays?

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 1:11 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I have been seeing the same thing for a few days now, on my
>> definitely-not-gmail personal server. Something's flaky in the
>> PG mail infrastructure. It's gotten better since yesterday's
>> outage, though I'm not convinced it's totally fixed.

> There have been some pretty bad issues with gmail recently. Some
> changes have been deployed that will hopefully help mitigate those and
> make things better, but it takes time to recover.

> The massive backlogs caused by gmail have been enough to spill over
> and affect other destinations as well simply due to the load created
> since we have such a huge number of gmail subscribers. But we're
> slowly seeing the backlogs shrink now and the load come down so
> hopefully the changes made will continue to have effect and let us be
> back to normal soon.

I'm still seeing multi-hour delivery delays on a subset of traffic,
like maybe half a dozen instances today.

Looking at the Received: timestamps shows pretty conclusively that
the delays are within PG infra, for example this recent message from
Heikki got hung up at two separate jumps:

Return-Path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M15-507066(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Received: from malur.postgresql.org (malur.postgresql.org [217.196.149.56])
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 392HruLZ2135620
(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 13:53:57 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+M15-507066(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>)
id 1qnN7D-00GbGd-FB
for tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 17:53:55 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>)
id 1qnGcb-00AqOg-Ti
for pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 10:57:53 +0000
Received: from meesny.iki.fi ([195.140.195.201])
by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>)
id 1qnF5S-007kvc-AQ
for pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 09:19:35 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.115] (dsl-hkibng22-54f8db-125.dhcp.inet.fi [84.248.219.125])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: hlinnaka)
by meesny.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Rzb4d51FBzydx;
Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:19:29 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <fe32d2a0-0998-d866-d6ee-2aed70b9be00(at)iki(dot)fi>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:19:29 +0300
...

Also, my own message <2154347(dot)1696278028(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> went
out to -hackers about 25 minutes ago and hasn't come back,
so based on other recent examples I'm betting I won't see it
for hours.

Plenty of other traffic *is* coming through in normal-ish time,
so I'm not sure I buy that there's still a massive logjam.

regards, tom lane