From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records |
Date: | 2008-01-21 23:03:29 |
Message-ID: | 21575.1200956609@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Strange. Most of the time I'd have no problem writing this off as a
>> build-synchronization error, but the tree has been so quiet lately due
>> to the release cycle that this seems an odd time to be seeing such a
>> problem.
> This was on a laptop I hadn't used in some time, and I think I must have
> done "make install" in, for example, src/backend only.
Ah. That could explain it, if you had a plpgsql.so that was quite out
of date compared to the backend. OK, then I'm prepared to forget about
this one ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillermo Arias | 2008-01-21 23:47:37 | create a limited user in Postgre |
Previous Message | Henrry Joshney Servitá Sánchez | 2008-01-21 22:38:03 | publicar |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-21 23:06:30 | Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-21 23:01:04 | Thoughts about bug #3883 |