Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features

From: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features
Date: 2006-10-12 01:21:09
Message-ID: 21563.24.91.171.78.1160616069.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>
>>> Since you're the one who wants hints, that's kind of up to you to
>>> define.
>>> Write a specification and make a proposal.
>>>
>>
>> What is the point of writing a proposal if there is a threat of "will be
>> rejected" if one of the people who would do the rejection doesn't at
>> least
>> outline what would be acceptable?
>
> Oh come on Mark, you have been here long enough to know how this works.

Exactly. IMHO, it is a frustrating environment. PostgreSQL is a great
system, and while I completely respect the individuals involved, I think
the "management" for lack of a better term, is difficult.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-12 01:22:07 Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2006-10-12 00:36:32 warning: "min" redefined of qsort.