Re: xl_heap_header alignment?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xl_heap_header alignment?
Date: 2020-08-22 15:45:18
Message-ID: 2155715.1598111118@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Updated patch.

FWIW, I concur with the idea of just dropping that sentence altogether.
It's not likely that getting rid of that field is a line of development
that will ever be pursued; if anyone does get concerned about cutting
WAL size, there's a lot of more-valuable directions to go in.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2020-08-22 18:48:54 Re: xl_heap_header alignment?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-08-22 15:37:34 Re: xl_heap_header alignment?