Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port
Date: 1999-05-27 00:40:58
Message-ID: 21526.927765658@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
> I've just discovered that libpq++'s makefile uses whatever is defined as
> CXX for the compiler.

As it should ...

> When I force it to use g++28 (ver 2.8.1), it misses /usr/include/g++.
> Adding that to the list of CXXFLAGS fixes that. Now then.. Will it
> break something on another platform if I were to leave that in the
> list?

Absolutely. For example: if someone has both g++ and a vendor C++
compiler installed, and tries to compile with the vendor C++, that
would fail because you'd be forcing the vendor C++ to try to eat
g++-specific include files.

The right place to fix any problem along this line is in configure,
*not* by hardwiring platform-dependent assumptions into libpq++'s
makefile.

If it's actually necessary to do what you suggest, then the way to
do it would be for configure to add -I/usr/include/g++ to CXXFLAGS
after checking that CXX is g++. However, I misdoubt that you have
diagnosed the problem correctly, because the versions of gcc/g++
that I've used automatically include their private include areas into
the -I list. This smells more like an incorrect installation of
g++ than a problem that Postgres ought to be solving.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas A. Szybist 1999-05-27 00:49:15 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-27 00:10:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: create index updates nrows statistics