| From: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features |
| Date: | 2006-10-11 23:18:11 |
| Message-ID: | 21525.24.91.171.78.1160608691.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Mark,
>
> First off, I'm going to request that you (and other people) stop hijacking
> Simon's thread on hypothetical indexes. Hijacking threads is an
> effective way to get your ideas rejected out of hand, just because the
> people whose thread you hijacked are angry with you.
>
> So please observe the thread split, thanks.
>
>> Well, if it would get rejected if it looked like Oracle, assuming you
>> would probably be one of the people rejecting it, what do you envision
>> as not being rejected?
>
> Something "better than Oracle".
>
> Since you're the one who wants hints, that's kind of up to you to define.
> Write a specification and make a proposal.
>
What is the point of writing a proposal if there is a threat of "will be
rejected" if one of the people who would do the rejection doesn't at least
outline what would be acceptable?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-11 23:27:29 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Previous Message | George Pavlov | 2006-10-11 23:15:53 | Re: query log corrupted-looking entries |