Re: Add support for AT LOCAL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Date: 2023-10-15 22:47:04
Message-ID: 2149166.1697410024@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Another possibly interesting factoid: it appears that before
97957fdba, we had zero regression test coverage of timetz_zone ---
and we still have none of timetz_izone, which contains essentially
the same code. So if there is a problem here, whether it's ours or
the compiler's, it's not hard to see why we didn't notice.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-10-15 22:47:33 Re: Questions about the new subscription parameter: password_required
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-10-15 22:24:13 Re: Add support for AT LOCAL