From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql |
Date: | 2011-01-19 17:10:16 |
Message-ID: | 21480.1295457016@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> opinion isn't strong in this topic. One or twenty useless detoasting
>> isn't really significant in almost use cases (problem is thousands
>> detoasting).
> Yeah. Many-times-repeated detoasting is really bad, and this is not
> the only place in the backend where we have this problem. :-(
Yeah, there's been some discussion of a more general solution, and I
think I even had a trial patch at one point (which turned out not to
work terribly well, but maybe somebody will have a better idea someday).
In the meantime, the proposal at hand seems like a bit of a stop-gap,
which is why I'd prefer to see something with a very minimal code
footprint. Detoast at assignment would likely need only a few lines
of code added in a single place.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-19 17:15:50 | Re: Replication logging |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-19 17:05:39 | Re: Replication logging |