Re: stopping "wal"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manuel Trujillo <manueltrujillo(at)dorna(dot)es>
Cc: pg-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stopping "wal"
Date: 2002-02-12 15:16:19
Message-ID: 21480.1013526979@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Manuel Trujillo <manueltrujillo(at)dorna(dot)es> writes:
> When more or two or three processes are working, and I stop the
> database, if I have any problem stopping the DB, I kill the backends (is
> a tester machine).

This is a bad idea.

> When I start the process "postmaster", the wal make a "recover of
> processes", returning to the last situation.
> I would like to know how to "say" to postmaster don't make a "recover"
> from the wal files.

And this would be worse.

If you don't care about your data, you can "initdb" to get rid of the
messed-up database. If you do care, you shouldn't be doing any of the
above.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Trujillo 2002-02-12 15:57:51 Re: stopping "wal"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-12 15:08:53 Re: problem with view/function after upgrade to 7.2