Re: ssize_t vs win64

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ssize_t vs win64
Date: 2010-01-03 00:02:30
Message-ID: 21478.1262476950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Well, I saw two definitions listed in this thread, and it wasn't clear
> to me the Python one was known to be the correct one:

> PostgreSQL has it as
> typedef long ssize_t;

That one is our 32-bit-only definition.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-01-03 00:03:51 Re: ssize_t vs win64
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-01-03 00:01:14 Re: ssize_t vs win64