From: | pere roca <peroc79(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: simple limit of decimals |
Date: | 2009-01-14 13:17:32 |
Message-ID: | 21455726.post@talk.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
dear Andreas,
thanks for the answer; yes, round should be the first, but it gives an
error: Function round(real, integer) does not exists
following this mail
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-01/msg00074.php) I created a
new function and now works!
best regards,
Pere
Andreas Kretschmer-4 wrote:
>
> In response to pere roca :
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> I update a column based on a division over two real values. It causes a
>> huge
>> number of decimals that I wanna to limit.
>>
>> UPDATE point_pol SET taxa_record = ((SELECT ((CASE WHEN numtax>0 THEN
>> numtax/numreg ELSE 1 END))) where userid='hello'
>>
>> taxa_record values are real and with real I cannot limit the decimals.
>> I tried to apply a round in the sql sentence but complains that round
>> must
>> be applied to a single value each time.
>
> Tray:
>
> UPDATE point_pol SET taxa_record = round(((SELECT ((CASE WHEN numtax>0
> THEN numtax/numreg ELSE 1 END))),2) ...
>
>
> to round to 2 decimal places.
>
>
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Kretschmer
> Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
> GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/simple-limit-of-decimals-tp21455215p21455726.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2009-01-14 13:32:40 | Re: Strange invalid constrain problem with PostgreSQL 8.3.1 |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-01-14 13:14:30 | Re: simple limit of decimals |