Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Date: 2017-02-26 20:59:24
Message-ID: 21444.1488142764@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
> wrote:
>> ISTM the consensus is that there should be no output in regular mode,
>> but a message should be displayed in verbose and progress mode.

> Agreed, and applied as one patch.

Is there an argument for back-patching this?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-02-26 21:09:39 Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2017-02-26 20:55:18 Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint