From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tuning PostgreSQL to use more RAM... |
Date: | 2000-08-19 03:17:28 |
Message-ID: | 21440.966655048@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com> writes:
> While I don't mind disk cache, I feel that we could get better
> performance by letting postgres use another hundred megs or so, especially
> since our entire /usr/local/pgsql/base directory has only 134 megs of data.
> We're currently starting the postmaster with "-B 2048".
You might try increasing the default -S setting as well.
I am not convinced that increasing -B to huge values will be a net win.
At some point you will start losing performance due to the sequential
scans of the buffer cache that are done at transaction commit (and other
places IIRC). I haven't done any benchmarking of different settings,
however, so I have no idea what the optimal level might be.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-19 03:40:34 | Re: rebuilding a table from a datafile |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-19 02:41:12 | Re: 7.0.2 install doesn't read .conf files |