Re: SQL Function Slowness, 8.3.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL Function Slowness, 8.3.0
Date: 2008-04-17 16:41:12
Message-ID: 21424.1208450472@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Aren't these suggestions mutually contradictory?

> No, they're orthogonal. The pretty printer would get the indenting and
> line feeds correct, the obfuscator would replace actual names with "A",
> "B" or "Table1" etc..

Hmm, that's not what I'd call an "obfuscator", more an "anonymizer".
Code obfuscators are generally intended to make code unreadable
(in fact de-pretty-printing is one of their chief techniques).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-04-17 16:50:55 Re: SQL Function Slowness, 8.3.0
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-04-17 16:25:57 Re: SQL Function Slowness, 8.3.0