Re: [HACKERS] Re: Peter opens a can of worms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Peter opens a can of worms
Date: 2000-01-15 05:39:25
Message-ID: 2140.947914765@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 2000-01-13, Tom Lane mentioned:
>> I have a feeling we will have to revert this change...

> I'd ask you to reconsider.

If you found a solution to the %m issue, I'm a happy camper. I thought
all the too-many-arguments gripes were because of %m, but evidently
I was mistaken. Good work!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-01-15 05:52:42 Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-01-15 05:31:31 Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up