| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | postgresql(at)richardneill(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted |
| Date: | 2023-02-15 22:36:58 |
| Message-ID: | 2137695.1676500618@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> From an implementation point of view, it looks trivial to just allow
> 0000 to mean 1 BC, however, the situation is more complex for negative
> numbers as ParseDateTime() sees the negative sign and categorises that
> portion as a timezone. The parsing would have to be adjusted to make
> this be seen as a year, and that'll cause us to suddenly start
> interpreting date strings differently from what we do now, which risks
> breaking applications. I'm not sure that's worth the risk.
Yeah, the real problem is that getting '-' to be seen as part of the
year field will cause havoc in the parsing rules. I'd say if you
want this sort of input, use make_date() or make_timestamptz() rather
than going through string form.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-02-15 23:03:07 | Re: BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2023-02-15 22:06:47 | Re: BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted |