Re: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of lar ge index items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of lar ge index items
Date: 2000-07-19 15:45:19
Message-ID: 21376.964021519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> While implementing multi-key btree-s for 6.1 I found problems with
> duplicates handling and this is why extra logic was added. But I never
> was happy with this logic -:)

Do you not like the proposal I was suggesting? I thought it was pretty
much what you said yourself a few months ago...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-19 16:27:33 Re: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of large index items
Previous Message Peter Mount 2000-07-19 15:26:30 RE: System tables since 7.0.0