| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Larry Rosenman <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, spaminos-sql(at)yahoo(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options |
| Date: | 2006-05-17 17:13:32 |
| Message-ID: | 21373.1147886012@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah, the last point seems like a killer objection :-(. It'd be
>>> better to add some sort of libpq function to handle the issue.
>>
>> and when I've proposed libpq functions to expose compile-time
>> constants, I've been shot down.
>>
>> How is this different?
> No idea, what is the URL of your proposal. Keep in mind this is not
> option-specific.
Hm, I was thinking of something like "bool PQisThreadSafe()". It sounds
like Bruce is thinking of something that'd return a string literal
containing configure flags and then apps would have to try to inspect
that to determine what they want to know. That seems fairly messy to
me; for one thing because it would imply wiring assumptions about
default configure flags into apps, and that's something that could
change over time.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-17 17:15:00 | Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2006-05-17 17:10:14 | Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options |