From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Do we still need PowerPC-specific timestamp_is_current/epoch? |
Date: | 2001-03-11 02:29:55 |
Message-ID: | 21329.984277795@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At the end of backend/utils/adt/datetime.c, there is some fairly ugly
code that is conditionally compiled on
#if defined(linux) && defined(__powerpc__)
Do we still need this? The standard versions of TIMESTAMP_IS_CURRENT
and TIMESTAMP_IS_EPOCH appear to work just fine on my Powerbook G3
running Linux 2.2.18 (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro).
I see from the CVS logs that Tatsuo originally introduced this code
on 1997/07/29 (at the time it lived in dt.c and was called
datetime_is_current & datetime_is_epoch). I suppose that it must have
been meant to work around some bug in old versions of gcc for PPC.
But it seems to me to be a net decrease in portability --- it's assuming
that the symbolic constants DBL_MIN and -DBL_MIN will produce particular
bit patterns --- so I'd like to remove it unless someone knows of a
recent Linux/PPC release that still needs it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-03-11 03:30:10 | Re: Do we still need PowerPC-specific timestamp_is_current/epoch? |
Previous Message | Nymia | 2001-03-11 00:51:22 | Re: doxygen & PG |