Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535
Date: 2021-06-11 22:44:28
Message-ID: 2131017.1623451468@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> There's one caveat, though - for regular builds the slowdown is pretty
> much eliminated. But with valgrind it's still considerably slower. For
> postgres_fdw the "make check" used to take ~5 minutes for me, now it
> takes >1h. And yes, this is entirely due to the new test case which is
> generating / inserting 70k rows. So maybe the test case is not worth it
> after all, and we should get rid of it.

I bet the CLOBBER_CACHE animals won't like it much either.

I suggest what we do is leave it in place for long enough to get
a round of reports from those slow animals, and then (assuming
those reports are positive) drop the test.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-06-11 22:49:07 Re: [PATCH] Fix buffer not null terminated on (ecpg lib)
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-06-11 22:39:02 Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535