| From: | Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) |
| Date: | 2016-01-19 14:29:28 |
| Message-ID: | 2130909473.19475887.1453213768203.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, you are right.
But in Fedora there is tooling where I can exclude dependency.
Even if we created maven profile we would have to patch source code somehow.
I think it's possible to do it way I proposed or rewrite ConnectionFactoryImpl class.
Pavel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Sitnikov" <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Pavel Kajaba" <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: "Stephen Nelson" <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com>, "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pavel Raiskup" <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 1:29:34 PM
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
>What do you think about this approach?
As long as <dependency>...</depencency> is there, mvn would complain
on "missing dependency".
The only sane way of excluding dependency "on demand" is maven profiles.
Vladimir
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Kajaba | 2016-01-19 14:31:25 | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-01-19 13:33:41 | Re: Re: [JDBC] 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |