| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
| Date: | 2003-10-04 19:58:35 |
| Message-ID: | 21306.1065297515@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I now have a C implementation of initdb, ...
> There's a little work still to go (see below), but I'd appreciate some
> eyeballs on it to see if I have made any major booboos, or could have
> done things better. What's the best way to proceed?
Put it on a web page and post the link, or if you don't have a website,
send it to pgsql-patches (clearly marked as "not ready to apply").
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-10-04 20:59:00 | Re: COUNT(*) again (was Re: [HACKERS] Index/Function |
| Previous Message | James Rogers | 2003-10-04 19:19:46 | Re: Index/Function organized table layout |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-04 23:15:15 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-03 18:57:42 | Re: initdb |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-04 22:51:08 | Re: more spanish updates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-04 19:43:34 | Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error |